Sense inside the appropriate and you can incorrect intimate practices
To investigate if the TTT system increases perception in different sexual practices, the new ‘Sufficient boundaries’ scale (parent-report version) (Dekker mais aussi al, in preparation) is used. Even better, this new flag program (Dutch: het Vlaggensysteem) , was administrated in the T1, T2 and you can T3 determine the accuracy regarding view away from acceptable and you can inappropriate sexual conclusion. Brand new banner system consists of pulled images that have people and you can kids exhibiting sexual behavior in almost any factors which is built to discuss an excellent directory of sexual practices having college students otherwise teenagers. The fresh rating of banner experience according to half dozen criteria to have judging intimate behavior: consent, equality, coercion, right for many years, suitable for framework, and you will worry about-esteem [38, 39]. An expert committee out of man health professionals find the ‘correct’ or very appropriate banner for each illustration into the 2 seasons growth of new banner program. In the modern study the latest banner experience entered directly. The study assistant first shows you the definition and employ of one’s five flags right after which suggests this new teenage 23 design you to-by-you to definitely. With every example, the study assistant requires new teenage to determine a banner, better judging brand new sexual behavior shown about illustration. The study secretary writes on the picked banner, in place of offering viewpoints towards the adolescent from inside the shot, and will continue to the next example. This new chosen flags of your adolescents is compared to the chose flags of the pro committee, and scored as the possibly correct otherwise wrong. A wrong flag you will suggest a milder wisdom otherwise a stricter judgment, versus normative view of your own specialist committee. I assess the common percent of perfect judgments, more gentle judgments and you will more strict judgments for each and every illustration of new banner program.
Inappropriate intimate conclusion and you can susceptability
To research if the TTT program reduces incorrect intimate conclusion and you can vulnerability, multiple separate bits of new TTI (self-declaration n = 8 and father or mother-declaration version letter = 12) (Dekker et al, in preparation) are utilized. Example affairs about mother or father-statement TTI is actually: “My personal son meets other people in which they do not want to be touched”, “My guy is able to set their/the lady limits from intimate get in touch with”, “Really does your son or daughter ever before wank on improper times, inside poor indicates or towns and cities?”. Particular example issues regarding the self-declaration TTI are: “We continue calling someone, though that individual possess conveyed he/she does not want one exposure to myself”, “I touch other people in the areas where they do not need certainly to end up being moved”, and “In general I’m good at enabling people understand what We are comfortable with and you can everything i have always been unpleasant having”.
Also, we use the Sex Troubles measure of one’s Kid Choices Number (CBCL) [40, 41] from the T1, T2 and you can T3, to choose the thickness out of psychosexual difficulties. The newest Sex Difficulties size include four activities from sexual problems, considering gender too-much, using very own pussy in public places, having fun with individual genitals way too much therefore the wish to be from the other gender [forty, 42]. Moms and dads rate for every product towards CBCL towards the a great 3-area size (0 = false, step 1 = a little otherwise either true, dos = most evident otherwise have a tendency to genuine). Lookup that provided this new CBCL Sex Dilemmas size with the aim of computing psychosexual dilemmas in the form of mother or father statement keeps served the message concurrent legitimacy from the level and the discriminant validity [42, 43].
Self-respect
To analyze whether or not the TTT program escalates the adolescents’ thinking-esteem the latest Care about-value level of your Dutch Identification Questionnaire (NPV-2) [44, 45] try administrated from the T1, T2 and you can T3. New NPV-2 include 132 facts, obtained on a good three-area scale (true, incorrect and not false, otherwise not the case) and measures the next 7 personality traits: inadequacy, social nervousness, firmness, bitterness, selfishness (complacency), dominance, and you will mind-value. In the present analysis, we utilize the self-respect scale, consisting of 19 items that the adolescents respond to regarding on their own. Types of concerns is actually: “We tend to getting vulnerable”, “I will manage jokes” and you may “I could doing everything i wanted”. Norm analysis of numerous populations (age.grams., standard and you may psychological customers) arrive and you will precision and you can what is happn authenticity of your self-esteem scale are perfect (? = 0.86) .