step one. This is certainly a standard instrument enabling behavioral/psychological dilemmas as examined, predicated on definitions. The fresh record getting child behavior included in this research is actually good 112-items survey to be replied by teenagers themselves. It is designed to pick syndromes of issues that tend to occur with her. The brands of your eight syndromes are believed short term definitions off the items comprising her or him unlike symptomatic brands. Desk 1 suggests the fresh syndromes as well as their particular habits.
Into the another research, this new chi square try was applied to examine the fresh new dependence or independence ranging from sociodemographic parameters (gender and age) and you may syndromes (discover desk 3)
2. Survey on the points associated with choices dilemmas and migration. It means contains an intro-reason to put the person responding the brand new questionnaire. The initial part consisted Pueblo casual hookup of inquiries concerning general details about the new informant since the second contained 16 discover and you may signed questions labeled with the three size: college environment, family relations and you will migration.
Each other instruments (new Achenbach questionnaire additionally the survey to the affairs pertaining to condition behavior and migration) was in fact applied every single of your professionals at the its universities.
The information showed that per cent of scholar society gonna school in town out-of Xalapa were teenagers, one to otherwise each of whose moms and dads was basically migrants from the United Says. Of them, inside 65 per cent the daddy is actually an excellent migrant, followed by mom (twelve %) and you can low fee, a couple (dos %) and 20 percent don’t address. These people were and additionally asked about the way they considered towards father’s absence, to which 40 percent answered which they noticed bad; 30 % mentioned that they sensed a good and only four % said that these people were indifferent.
Concerning your decisions difficulties stated because of the teenagers themselves, full, 59.nine percent can probably be said are in regular range, 16 per cent inside the an effective borderline diversity (outside the standard without having to be systematic), when you’re 24.1 percent of participants was basically found into the medical diversity. Simultaneously, dining table dos reveals new problem in terms of the team. This new syndrome on the high commission-regarding the systematic diversity-is actually competitive choices in organizations.
A statistically factor was seen in regards to gender and you will certain syndromes, because the guys throughout the clinical range provides a greater percentage of practices like introversion, somatization, competitive conclusion and you can laws-cracking, while you are a high portion of lady slide in medical range of desire troubles
That it searching for corroborates exactly what degree such as men and women by the Farrington (1989), Trianes (2000), Tattum and you can Lane (1989), Whitney and you may Smith (1993) inform you regarding aggressive decisions from inside the age range, that is readable given the phase of transition where youngsters is located, characterized by practices eg disobedience, becoming requiring, rebelliousness, and others, that will be an issue of version during the a later on years.
You will find statistically significant differences when considering the children regarding low-migrant and you will migrant mothers, because latter have increased percentage from the health-related diversity from inside the practices eg stress, somatization, public problems, attention trouble, aggressive choices and you can laws-breaking (find table 2). It getting hushed, unsociable plus don’t take part in classification products.
In relation to age and syndromes, the ? 2 test shows a difference in introversion syndromes (? 2 = , gl = 10, p < .05) social problems (? 2 = , gl = 10, p < .05) thought problems (? 2 = , gl = 10,p < .05), attention problems (? 2 = , gl = 10, p < .05) and aggressive behavior (? 2 = , gl = 10, p < .05), showing that young adults (between 16 and 18) have higher percentages in the clinical range of these syndromes.