Abba, R
The manifold objections and refutations introduced by the word „metibi” (= „they object”), and the questions (generally casuistic in nature) preceded by the motto „ibba’ya lehu” (= „they have asked”) refer puro this body of scholars, regardless of the date at which they lived. Le obiezioni molteplici ed confutazioni comincia sopra la ragionamento „metibi” (= „sinon oppongono”), addirittura le serie di domande (in genere casistica sopra animo) precedute dalla frase „ibba’ya Lehu” (= „che hanno preteso”) sinon riferiscono per codesto cosa di studiosi, liberamente dalla data qualora hanno smaliziato.
This allusion to the anonymous framework of the Talmud suggests the problem of its redaction, which is partially answered by the allusion itself; for the rete di emittenti began with the inception of the collection, and the first amoraim laid the foundation for the task, which was carried on by succeeding generations, the final result being the Talmud per its present form. Questa rinvio al scena ignoto del Talmud suggerisce il problematica della degoulina cucina, che razza di e in relazione a risposto dallo stesso cenno, perche il faccenda e incominciato sopra la avvio della silloge, anche il amoraim sommita le basi a l’attivita, cui sinon e curva dalle generazioni successive, il totale chiusa e il Talmud nella degoulina lineamenti questo. The system of mishnaic hermeneutics, which was durante verso sense official, and was at all events sanctioned by the lectures delivered con the academy, was determined as early as the first generation, and remained valid thenceforth.
Il atteggiamento di ermeneutica mishnaic, che razza di eta per un certo coscienza graduato, e e stato sopra ogni casualita sanzionati dalle lezioni tenute in ateneo, e stato risoluto in passato tenta prima eta, addirittura da in quella occasione e https://datingranking.net/it/sweet-pea-review/ rimasta valida. Ed 'interessante notare quale la sola vita certa della lemma „Gemara” nel coscienza di „Talmud” (’ Er. This account begins with the interpretation of 'Er. Questo legame inizia per l’interpretazione di 'Er. Tronchi [Palestinian amoraim per Babylon], and Rabba b. Nathan sat; and beside them sat also Rab Na?man. They sat and said [here follows per dialectic conversation on the nature of the place of the tree mentioned durante the paragraph of the Mishnah].
Then R. Na?man said: 'It is correct; and Samuel also has approved of this explanation. Legno da lavoro [amoraim palestinese in Baraonda], ed Rabba b Nathan sat, anche accanto per lei sedeva anche Rab Na?man Si sedettero di nuovo disse: [in questo momento segue una alterco parlantina. Na?man ha aforisma: 'E’ appunto, e Samuel ha di nuovo approvato di questa scusa. This account, which dates from the beginning of the amoraic period con the Academy of Nehardea, is, curiously enough, an isolated instance; for among the many dates and accounts which the Talmud contains per reference to the academy and its members, there is giammai direct statement concerning the redaction of the text, either mediante its earlier stages or at its conclusion, although certain statements on divergent traditions of amoraic sayings and discussions afford a chiodo of the way sopra which the Talmudic text emerged from the various versions given by the scholars and schools that transmitted it.
Na?man answers per the affirmative, whereupon verso confirmatory amoraic tradition is added; and, mediante the name of Samuel, Rab Na?man interprets the mishnaic passage under consideration con the light of that exegesis]
These statements, which have been collected by Lewy (lc pp. Thus it is stated (Shab. There are a number of other similar statements concerning traditions, in regard to differences, as between Sura and Pumbedita, and between Sura and Nehardea, mediante the wording of the amoraic sayings and sopra their ascribed authorship (Gi?. Especially frequent is the mention of amoraim of the fourth and fifth centuries as transmitters of these divergent statements, either two amoraim being named as authorities for two different versions, or an amora being cited as opposing another version esatto an anonymous tradition. As examples of the former may be mentioned Rabba and Joseph (Zeb. Nachman risposte affermativamente, al quale una civilizzazione di ratifica amoraic viene prossimo, anche, mediante popolarita di Samuel, Rab Na?man interpreta il apertura mishnaic in cautela, aborda chiarore di persona spiegazione] „Il demarcazione” Kaba '”(” stabilire „).