89 (SD = 2.27); cuatro.94 (SD = 2.97), both organizations differing anywhere between half a year and you will eleven many years of dating; 7.76 (SD = 4.01), ranging from a couple and 19 age; and you can (SD = 4.82), anywhere between below per year and you will 29 many years. 8%) and you can existed with nearest and dearest, if you are people coping with the couples was basically mainly operating some body (69.2%), from which 53% had school otherwise postgraduate amount. Of your specialized connection people, 67% got college or blog post-scholar level, at which 89.8% was basically functioning, 2% retired and you can 8.2% out of work. The functional disease towards the partnered professionals try comparable: 89.5% was basically performing, dos.9% had been retired and 6.3% was unemployed, and you will step one.3% known various other a position standing. Within this class, 62.5% of people got college otherwise postgraduate grade.
Relationships Top quality, picked to ensure criteria authenticity, try mentioned toward Relationships Rating Form–Modified (RRF-R; Davis, 1996, adapt
The data demonstrated is obtained during the framework from broader browse ideas, and that contained an in depth sociodemographic and you may matchmaking review, along with other balances in the range away from intimate dating.
Private relationship are examined with regards to the Portuguese type (Dining table step 1) of one’s shorter types of the brand new Effort Measure (Stanley, 1986), that was translated depending on the after the translation and you can retroversion methods: shortly after consent received by the copywriter, the first level is actually translated because of the a few experts in the field, both of these translations was subjected to retroversion from the one or two experts, you to bilingual and something experienced in employing brand new English language; eventually, per variation is actually versus brand new scale, going for using the fresh words and products that have better distance so you’re able to they. New Portuguese type hence consisted of new 14 original activities and you may the same respond to level and you may is called, immediately after deliberation by party, the personal Union Measure (’Escala de Compromisso Pessoal’–ECP). For the last stage of your interpretation techniques, the new device is applied to three professionals towards the goal of verifying the newest adequateness of vocabulary as well as the unambiguous comprehension of what exactly, which were discussed for the users immediately after application of the fresh new questionnaire. As there have been no statements saying otherwise, stuff remained a comparable.
With regards to the overall time of the relationship, the typical, in many years, into additional statuses explained try, respectively: dos
by Lind, 2008). Resulting from a revision of the original Davis (1996, cited in Lind, 2008) scale, this instrument is intended to measure relationship quality perception, with the expectation that, according to the theoretical assumptions, both scales will positively correlate. The items are presented in the form of questions that the subjects will answer according to a rating scale of 1 (not at all) to 9 (completely or extremely). The Portuguese version consists of a total of 46 items grouped in four dimensions: Passion, Confidence, Conflict and Intimacy. The RRF-R revealed psychometric properties ranging from good to excellent, obtaining an excellent internal consistency at the total scale level, with Cronbach’s alpha values between .97 and .98, for women and men brazilcupid respectively, and .81 and .97 at subscale level, a good temporal stability (significant correlations ranging between .70 and .87; p < .01) and high concurrent validity with a marital satisfaction scale (significant global score correlations between .88 and .85, for women and men respectively; p < .01). In the current sample, the RRF-R presented for the total scale, an excellent Cronbach's alpha of .96; .94 for the Passion subscale, .93 for Confidence, .77 for Conflict and .83 for Intimacy. The internal consistency of the total scale remained excellent for the four subsamples: .95 for participants in a dating relationship, .94 for those in a dating relationship with cohabitation and .97 for participants in both formal unions and married relationships.