- ^ The 5 sandwich-type of fillers were: crossbreed agreement nouns that have a good possessive adjective (Julijin komsija “Julija’s next-door neighbor,” in which komsija can also be result in M or F arrangement), as with (15b); crossbreed arrangement nouns that have an effective possessive pronoun (moje cerekalo “my laugher,” where cerekalo can be cause M or Letter arrangement), such as (15c); NSg animate nouns having an enthusiastic ordinal amount [prvo prase “(the) earliest pig,” in which prase have a hybrid plural form, causing FSg or NPl contract], such as (15d); normal arrangement nouns that have a great MSg affordable complement [uspeh dekana “(the) achievement (of your own) dean,” the spot where the genitive fit is homonymous on paucal, therefore the paucal lets paucal and you may MPl contract], such as (15e); regular arrangement MSg nouns which have a PP fit (prijatelj iz skole “the new friend off college or university,” in which interest consequences could be questioned), as in (15f).
- ^ The newest salience of one’s examples was controlled on the pursuing the means. Very first, that author conceived the fresh new advice predicated on the woman instinct, while the almost every other analyzed them; where dispute emerged, instances was indeed changed and process was regular towards the newly put instances.
- ^ The importance of the essential difference between contract patterns in updates is actually orthogonal towards the hypotheses on desire of the report, because they merely create predictions regarding relative volume between your conditions, or amongst the requirements while the base-line ratios. I declaration such tests with regard to completeness of one’s report, just like the told from the publishers of the regularity.
- ^ I’ve designed and you will administered an alternative check out along these lines, and we are currently examining the data.
Recommendations
Arsenijevic, B., and you may Mitic, We. (2016a). “Effectation of animacy and you can agentivity to your control out of contract in the Serbo-Croatian,” for the Training in Sex dating review the Dialects and you can Head, Chose paperwork away from 3rd Novi Sad Workshop toward Psycholinguistics, Neurolinguistic and you will Health-related Linguistic Lookup, eds S. Halupka-Resetar and you will S. Martinez-Ferreiro (Novi Sad: Professors away from Beliefs), 41–77.
Arsenijevic, B., and you can Mitic, We. (2016b). Towards the inside the reliance off intercourse regarding amount when you look at the agreement having paired subjects: an experimental investigation. J. Slavic Linguist. twenty four, 41–69.
Ba). Morphology, agreement and dealing memories recovery from inside the sentence manufacturing: evidence out-of gender and situation in the Slovak. J. Mem. Lang. 56, 65–85.
Barber, H., and you may Carreiras, M. (2005). Grammatical intercourse and you will matter agreement in Language: An enthusiastic ERP analysis. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 137–153.
Bhatt, Roentgen., and you may Walkow, M. (2013). Finding agreement inside the grammar: a quarrel out of agreement in the conjunctions. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Idea 30, 951–1013.
Bojovic, D. (2003). Neki slucajevi kongruencije koordinirane subjekatske sintagme s preponiranim i postponiranim predikatom u srpskom jeziku. Srpski Jezik 8, 539–555.
Lme4: Linear Blended-Consequences Designs Using S4 Categories
Carminati, Yards. (2005). Processing reactions of your own element steps (individual > number > gender) and you will implications to possess linguistic principle. Lingua 115, 259–285.
Chomsky, N. (2001). “Derivation by the Phase,” inside Ken Hale. A lives for the Code, ed. M. Kenstowicz (Cambridge: MIT Drive), 1–52.
Citko, B. (2004). “Agreement asymmetries in coordinate formations,” in Official Ways to Slavic linguistics: The newest Ottawa Meeting 2003, eds A beneficial. Olga, W. Browne, cpsfnmM. Luisacpefnm Rivero, and you will D. Stojanovic (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Courses), 91–108.
De- Vincenzi, Meters. (1999). Differences between this new morphology regarding intercourse and matter: research of setting-up coreferences. J. Psycholinguist. Res. twenty-eight, 537–553.
De- Vincenzi, Yards., and you can Di Domenico, E. (1999). A big change certainly one of ?-features: this new character from sex and you may number on the retrieval out-of pronoun antecedents. Ital. J. Linguist. eleven, 41–74.
Doron, E. (2000). “VSO and you can leftover-conjunct agreement : biblical Hebrew versus. progressive Hebrew,” on Syntax of your own Verb Very first Languages, eds An effective. Carnie and E. Guilfoyle (Nyc, NY: Oxford School Press), 75–96.